East Harlem Online Discussion Forums  

Go Back   East Harlem Online Discussion Forums > Culture > Arts/Culture
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2007, 09:45 PM
Jose's Avatar
Jose Jose is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Harlem/El Barrio/Spanish Harlem
Posts: 272
Artist Housing: Give Me A Break!

East Harlem, September 1, 2007. East Harlem, September 1, 2007. I just received an e-mail from our beloved state senator, Jose M. Serrano, praising the Governor for signing a bill which provides assistance for artist housing needs

Here is the text of the e-mail verbatim:

Quote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New York, NY - Senator Josť M. Serrano (D-Manhattan/Bronx) today applauded Governor Eliot Spitzer's decision to sign into law a bill that would provide much needed assistance for artist housing needs.

The legislation, introduced by Assemblywoman Joan Millman (D-Brooklyn), would provide grants over a two-year period of $12,000 for individual artists, or $22,000 for a group of artists who share live-work space.

"This legislation is long overdue for the artists in our communities," said Senator Serrano. "Artists, in so many ways, provide the cultural vitality and the economic machinery that our growing communities need. Governor Spitzer recognizes this fact, and I congratulate him for supporting this legislation."

The Governor signed the bill with the expectation that the state legislature would provide the funds to support the grants in their next budget. "In the past, our legislature's support for artists has been abysmal at best. I will do all that I can to ensure that funding is provided in next year's budget for this critical program."

As Chair of the Senate Democratic Task Force on the Arts and Cultural Affairs, Senator Serrano has been a vocal proponent of the arts as an economic engine - one that can help spark the Upstate economy, and empower working class communities in New York City.

This past month, the Senator hosted the Fourth Annual East Harlem Arts Festival, which has emerged as a diverse and popular venue for local talent. In his yearly legislative grants, the Senator has consistently funded respected cultural institutions - both large and small - in East Harlem, Roosevelt Island and the Bronx.

Serrano concluded: "By putting in place the affordable infrastructure for artists to live and work, we are ensuring that New York - both city and state - remain the Cultural Capital of the World."


Now, what could possible be wrong with the governor singing this legislation into law? There are a views problems. For instance, why do artist get this special treatment? And why housing aid? The response one is likely to get to that question is that artist by virtue of being artist do not make much and therefore need assistance, right?

By why are we subsidizing those who (1) choose to become artist and who then (2)do not obtain regular employment until their art takes off and sustains them? A lot of actors work waiting tables until their careers take off or until they are discovered. They are self supporting while they pursue their art. The way it should be done.

But being asked to use tax money to provide for those who wish to pursue their art is a bit over board. Artist who choose to live solely off their art are more than welcome to do so. But they should not expect the good people of the state or city of New York to support them in their decision not to seek employment that could sustain them while they pursue their art careers.

They can choose to work doing anything else that can support them. Or they can choose to live off their art. But this is a choice they make. This choice has consequences, that being of probably not making much of a living. But why should the tax payer be FORCED to pay for their career decisions; their housing in any way shape or form?

The best way to help "self-starving" artist is to have a state and city economy where jobs are plentiful, where everyone can obtain employment. That way artist can be employed (yes not as artist), but at least they are not living off the rest of us. Yes, artist should pursue their hearts vocation, but not at the tax payers expense.

Struggling married couples with children are much more in need of housing assistance. As are the poor or anyone else who finds themselves in a situation, not of their choosing, where they need housing assistance from their fellow man.

Some artist do provide for a more vibrant economy, but so do a lot of other work people, construction workers, policemen, firemen, shoe salesmen, etc... They are not asking for a free ride. No one else should either.

Remember, the state has no money. It does not create anything. The state is a steward of the tax payer's money. I ask our state representatives to be good stewards of our tax money. The middle class can't keep taking assaults on their wallets. At some point they will revolt. And this writer will be fighting along side them. Let the Over Taxed Revolt Begin! What do you think?

Note: This writer loves art, art that edifies and that is understandable. If the layman can not understand the art, then the artist has failed to convey the meaning of the art and has just failed period. Abstractions are not art. JBR
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2007, 04:18 PM
LSRA LSRA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: east harlem
Posts: 114
Jose Jose Jose

Don't Blame The Victim.....at One Time Artist Could Live In Our Communities Of Color, Thrive And Contribute To The Fiber Of The Neighborhood.....but With Gentrification The Decision Is Not About When I Make It But More About Staying In The Game And Contributing To The Society.....my Wife Always Says That Artist Are The Visionaries Of Tomorrow. No Society Can Survive Without Artist From Cavemen To The Present. Don't Be To Hard On The Governor Nor The Senator They Are Just Opening Doors For Generations Of Artists To Continue Their Work....."the Only Abstraction That Cannot Be Understood Is The One That Abstracts Our Souls...".

Lotherapez
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2007, 01:01 AM
Jose's Avatar
Jose Jose is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Harlem/El Barrio/Spanish Harlem
Posts: 272
Society can survive without artist, as most do anyway. Artists need to obtain work and support their dream. If they are true artist, nothing can stop them from doing their art.

But why should I support them in their decision not to work? I would love to do this web site 24 hours a day, but I must work to support my family. I do not look to the government for funding as I can support this site for now. I love the Arts, but some artist do take advantage of our great safety net and use it instead of working. This is not fair to me, as I could use the money to pay for private colleges for my children instead of CUNY.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2007, 09:23 AM
LSRA LSRA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: east harlem
Posts: 114
artist

no society on the face of the earth has survived without the input and vision of the artist...who says artist don't work. Stereotyping artist is as old as the wind. Artist work to support their art. I am an artist that works. All the artist I know work or have worked at something long enough to live on their gains. You are an artist that works....as for cuny and suny and private colleges etc. the tci and interboros etc. We have to stop the increases in tuitions for colleges that were once free to everyone until we started attending. Private colleges is a luxuary few afford and even fewer complete. Once completed or attempted, the loans alone even if grants and scholarships were granted, places one in debt for the better part of their life time. Hence the increase of small private colleges like interboro and tci. If there is one thing I am conservative about is the fact that if you want to go to college and study you can do it in NYC.

lotherapez
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2008, 09:19 PM
Jose's Avatar
Jose Jose is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Harlem/El Barrio/Spanish Harlem
Posts: 272
Although it would be nice to have the state pay for my children to go to Fordham, or Iona, or even Columbia, someone else would be footing the bill. We all tend to forget that when we make demands of institutions, the city, the state, that those demands cost someone something. The state creates nothing. Government takes our hard earned money and redistributes it.

So nothing is free. I'd rather pay less taxes and have more for my family than to have the state take it away to fund something that does not work, but that will garner votes for some politician. We need politicians who are good stewards of our money. Who remember where it comes from. We don't need politicians like the President of the City Council, who poster as if she is good, but who has a slush fund. The maxim holds true, Never Trust A Liberal. Liberals live in fantasy land, don't know or work with human nature and feel free to continue to pick our pockets.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:45 AM
LSRA LSRA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: east harlem
Posts: 114
ok

we don't always agree but if you run i will support you.

lotherapez
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Rights Reserved, 2002-2008